Skip to content
Compare Feyenoord vs Slaven

Feyenoord vs Slaven Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Feyenoord vs Slaven: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Feyenoord Feyenoord Home Team
Slaven Slaven Away Team
Feyenoord
53.2
D W W D D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Slaven
31.9
W L D L D L L D L D

Categories Won

11

Feyenoord

2

Draw

2

Slaven

Performance Radar

Feyenoord
Slaven

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Ueda (7 goals)
M. Dabro (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.9

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

35.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.24

1.04

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
53.2

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 62.3, Form: 41.6

31.9

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 31.2, Form: 8.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

2

31-45'

5
4

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

1
Feyenoord
Slaven
Feyenoord

Power Rating Breakdown

53.2

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 62.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 63.7
Slaven

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 31.2
Form 8.5
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 48.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Feyenoord logo Feyenoord
D
AZ (67%)
W
Fortuna (61%)
W
Groningen (61%)
D
NEC (69%)
D
Volendam (54%)
D
Ajax (62%)
W
Excelsior (54%)
D
NAC (54%)
Slaven logo Slaven
W
Gorica (44%)
L
Istra (46%)
D
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
D
Hajduk (53%)
L
Varaždin (54%)
L
Rijeka (44%)
D
Osijek (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ H
1 - 1 D
67%
Fortuna A
2 - 1 W
61%
Groningen H
3 - 1 W
61%
NEC A
1 - 1 D
69%
Volendam A
0 - 0 D
54%
Ajax H
1 - 1 D
62%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
NAC A
3 - 3 D
54%
Twente A
0 - 2 L
81%
Telstar H
2 - 1 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
1 - 3 L
46%
Vukovar H
2 - 2 D
32%
Lokomotiva A
1 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
2 - 2 D
53%
Varaždin A
1 - 2 L
54%
Rijeka H
0 - 2 L
44%
Osijek H
0 - 0 D
40%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 4 L
76%
Gorica A
2 - 2 D
50%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Feyenoord has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.9) compared to Slaven (SoS: 35.1). This means Feyenoord's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Feyenoord holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus Slaven's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Feyenoord has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Slaven's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Feyenoord emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (53.2 vs 31.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Feyenoord

Feyenoord

VS
Slaven

Slaven

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more