Skip to content
Compare Feyenoord vs Thun

Feyenoord vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Feyenoord vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Feyenoord Feyenoord Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Feyenoord
53.2
D W W D D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

8

Feyenoord

5

Draw

2

Thun

Performance Radar

Feyenoord
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Ueda (7 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.9

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.24

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
53.2

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 62.3, Form: 41.6

41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

2
Feyenoord
Thun
Feyenoord

Power Rating Breakdown

53.2

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 62.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 63.7
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Feyenoord logo Feyenoord
D
AZ (67%)
W
Fortuna (61%)
W
Groningen (61%)
D
NEC (69%)
D
Volendam (54%)
D
Ajax (62%)
W
Excelsior (54%)
D
NAC (54%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ H
1 - 1 D
67%
Fortuna A
2 - 1 W
61%
Groningen H
3 - 1 W
61%
NEC A
1 - 1 D
69%
Volendam A
0 - 0 D
54%
Ajax H
1 - 1 D
62%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
NAC A
3 - 3 D
54%
Twente A
0 - 2 L
81%
Telstar H
2 - 1 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Feyenoord has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.9) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Feyenoord's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Feyenoord averaging 1.5 and Thun averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Feyenoord has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Feyenoord has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Feyenoord

Feyenoord

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more