Compare Feyenoord vs Westerlo

Feyenoord vs Westerlo Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Feyenoord vs Westerlo: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Feyenoord Home Team

Westerlo Away Team

Feyenoord

53.2

D W W D D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Westerlo

45.7

L D L W L W W D L W

Categories Won

Feyenoord

Draw

Westerlo

Performance Radar

Feyenoord

Westerlo

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

A. Ueda (7 goals)

Nacho Ferri (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 11

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.9

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

51.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.74

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.24

1.42

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating

53.2

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 62.3, Form: 41.6

45.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 50.6, Form: 40.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Feyenoord

Westerlo

Power Rating Breakdown

53.2

Overall

Attack 52.0

Defense 62.3

Form 41.6

Consistency 63.7

Power Rating Breakdown

45.7

Overall

Attack 47.3

Defense 50.6

Form 40.5

Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 54.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%

Feyenoord

Westerlo

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

AZ H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

Fortuna A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 1 W

61%

Groningen H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 1 W

61%

NEC A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

69%

Volendam A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

54%

Ajax H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

62%

Excelsior H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 1 W

54%

NAC A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 3 D

54%

Twente A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

81%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 1 W

64%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 3 L

54%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 3 D

35%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 4 L

40%

OHL A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

40%

Genk H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

49%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

72%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 0 W

57%

Standard A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

72%

Club Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

78%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.9 vs 51.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Feyenoord averaging 1.5 and Westerlo averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Feyenoord has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Westerlo's 1.5.

Westerlo has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Westerlo is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Feyenoord has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Feyenoord

Westerlo

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair