Skip to content
Compare Fortuna vs Auxerre

Fortuna vs Auxerre Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fortuna vs Auxerre: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fortuna Fortuna Home Team
Auxerre Auxerre Away Team
Fortuna
43.6
W L L D L L W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Auxerre
51.4
W W L D D D W L D D

Categories Won

4

Fortuna

4

Draw

7

Auxerre

Performance Radar

Fortuna
Auxerre

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Sierhuis (4 goals)
L. Sinayoko (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.1

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.1

55.5

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.77

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.27

1.98

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.48

Adjusted Power Rating
43.6

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 38.2, Form: 41.6

51.4

Attack: 52.8, Defense: 66.8, Form: 31.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
4

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
6

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

4

76-90+'

1
Fortuna
Auxerre
Fortuna

Power Rating Breakdown

43.6

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 38.2
Form 41.6
Consistency 39.7
Auxerre

Power Rating Breakdown

51.4

Overall

Attack 52.8
Defense 66.8
Form 31.7
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

63.1 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Fortuna logo Fortuna
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Feyenoord (67%)
L
Heerenveen (72%)
D
NAC (49%)
L
AZ (72%)
L
Twente (76%)
W
Volendam (54%)
L
Telstar (64%)
Auxerre logo Auxerre
W
Nice (55%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lyon (70%)
D
Monaco (77%)
D
Nantes (51%)
D
Le Havre (58%)
W
Brest (56%)
L
Marseille (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zwolle H
3 - 2 W
54%
Feyenoord H
1 - 2 L
67%
Heerenveen A
1 - 2 L
72%
NAC H
1 - 1 D
49%
AZ A
0 - 2 L
72%
Twente H
1 - 2 L
76%
Volendam A
2 - 1 W
54%
Telstar H
1 - 4 L
64%
NEC A
3 - 2 W
69%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nice H
2 - 1 W
55%
Angers H
3 - 1 W
47%
Lyon A
2 - 3 L
70%
Monaco A
2 - 2 D
77%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
51%
Le Havre A
1 - 1 D
58%
Brest H
3 - 0 W
56%
Marseille A
0 - 1 L
66%
Strasbourg H
0 - 0 D
55%
Lorient A
2 - 2 D
69%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.1 vs 55.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Fortuna averaging 1.5 and Auxerre averaging 1.5 goals per match.

Auxerre has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Fortuna's 1.9.

Fortuna has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Auxerre has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fortuna

Fortuna

VS
Auxerre

Auxerre

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more