Compare Fortuna vs Dender

Fortuna vs Dender Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fortuna vs Dender: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fortuna Home Team

Dender Away Team

Fortuna

43.6

W L L D L L W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Categories Won

Fortuna

Draw

Dender

Performance Radar

Fortuna

Dender

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-4

-8

Clean Sheet

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

90%

9 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

K. Sierhuis (4 goals)

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

Home Win Rate

33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

54.1

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.1

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 3 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.77

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.27

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating

43.6

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 38.2, Form: 41.6

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Fortuna

Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

43.6

Overall

Attack 52.0

Defense 38.2

Form 41.6

Consistency 39.7

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

63.1 vs 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Fortuna

Dender

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Zwolle H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

54%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

67%

Heerenveen A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

72%

NAC H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

49%

AZ A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

72%

Twente H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

76%

Volendam A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 1 W

54%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 4 L

64%

NEC A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

69%

Excelsior H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 1 W

54%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.1 vs 44.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Fortuna holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus Dender's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Fortuna conceding 1.9 and Dender conceding 1.8 per match.

Fortuna has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Fortuna has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fortuna

Dender

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair