Compare Fortuna vs Monaco

Fortuna vs Monaco Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fortuna vs Monaco: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fortuna Home Team

Monaco Away Team

Fortuna

43.6

W L L D L L W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Monaco

67.7

L W D D L W W W W W

Categories Won

Fortuna

Draw

Monaco

Performance Radar

Fortuna

Monaco

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-4

Clean Sheet

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

90%

9 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

K. Sierhuis (4 goals)

F. Balogun (8 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 13

Home Win Rate

33%

2W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

54.1

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.1

69.4

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.4

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 3 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.77

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.27

2.08

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.28

Adjusted Power Rating

43.6

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 38.2, Form: 41.6

67.7

Attack: 71.6, Defense: 67.7, Form: 71.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Fortuna

Monaco

Power Rating Breakdown

43.6

Overall

Attack 52.0

Defense 38.2

Form 41.6

Consistency 39.7

Power Rating Breakdown

67.7

Overall

Attack 71.6

Defense 67.7

Form 71.6

Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

63.1 vs 64.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%

Fortuna

Monaco

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Zwolle H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

54%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

67%

Heerenveen A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

72%

NAC H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

49%

AZ A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

72%

Twente H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

76%

Volendam A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 1 W

54%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 4 L

64%

NEC A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

69%

Excelsior H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 1 W

54%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lille H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

73%

Metz A

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

48%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

2 - 2 D

62%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

2 - 2 D

66%

Paris FC A

French Ligue 1

1 - 4 L

77%

Marseille H

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

61%

Lyon A

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

70%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

2 - 0 W

56%

Paris SG A

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

84%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

2 - 0 W

47%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Monaco has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 69.4) compared to Fortuna (SoS: 54.1). This means Monaco's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Monaco holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Fortuna's 1.5, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Monaco has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Fortuna's 1.9.

Fortuna has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Monaco has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Monaco is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Monaco emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (67.7 vs 43.6) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fortuna

Monaco

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair