Skip to content
Compare Fortuna vs Parma

Fortuna vs Parma Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fortuna vs Parma: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fortuna Fortuna Home Team
Parma Parma Away Team
Fortuna
43.6
W L L D L L W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Parma
40.5
L L W W D D L L D D

Categories Won

10

Fortuna

1

Draw

4

Parma

Performance Radar

Fortuna
Parma

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Sierhuis (4 goals)
N. Elphege (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.1

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.1

63.0

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.77

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.27

1.0

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
43.6

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 38.2, Form: 41.6

40.5

Attack: 30.1, Defense: 60.3, Form: 22.6

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

6

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

76-90+'

3
Fortuna
Parma
Fortuna

Power Rating Breakdown

43.6

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 38.2
Form 41.6
Consistency 39.7
Parma

Power Rating Breakdown

40.5

Overall

Attack 30.1
Defense 60.3
Form 22.6
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

63.1 vs 67.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 14%
Fortuna logo Fortuna
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Feyenoord (67%)
L
Heerenveen (72%)
D
NAC (49%)
L
AZ (72%)
L
Twente (76%)
W
Volendam (54%)
L
Telstar (64%)
Parma logo Parma
L
Roma (70%)
L
Inter Milan (84%)
W
Pisa (40%)
W
Udinese (79%)
D
Napoli (74%)
D
Lazio (76%)
L
Cremonese (51%)
L
Torino (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zwolle H
3 - 2 W
54%
Feyenoord H
1 - 2 L
67%
Heerenveen A
1 - 2 L
72%
NAC H
1 - 1 D
49%
AZ A
0 - 2 L
72%
Twente H
1 - 2 L
76%
Volendam A
2 - 1 W
54%
Telstar H
1 - 4 L
64%
NEC A
3 - 2 W
69%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Roma H
2 - 3 L
70%
Inter Milan A
0 - 2 L
84%
Pisa H
1 - 0 W
40%
Udinese A
1 - 0 W
79%
Napoli H
1 - 1 D
74%
Lazio A
1 - 1 D
76%
Cremonese H
0 - 2 L
51%
Torino A
1 - 4 L
74%
Fiorentina A
0 - 0 D
71%
Cagliari H
1 - 1 D
53%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.1 vs 63.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Fortuna holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus Parma's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Parma has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Fortuna's 1.9.

Fortuna has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Parma has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fortuna

Fortuna

VS
Parma

Parma

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more