Skip to content
Compare Fortuna vs Betis

Fortuna vs Betis Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fortuna vs Betis: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fortuna Fortuna Home Team
Betis Betis Away Team
Fortuna
43.6
W L L D L L W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Betis
51.0
W D W D W L D D D L

Categories Won

4

Fortuna

2

Draw

9

Betis

Performance Radar

Fortuna
Betis

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Sierhuis (4 goals)
A. Ezzalzouli (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.1

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.1

58.5

League Difficulty: 91.4, Opponent Quality: 62.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.77

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.27

2.18

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.58

Adjusted Power Rating
43.6

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 38.2, Form: 41.6

51.0

Attack: 57.9, Defense: 57.9, Form: 32.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
4

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
6

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

4

76-90+'

2
Fortuna
Betis
Fortuna

Power Rating Breakdown

43.6

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 38.2
Form 41.6
Consistency 39.7
Betis

Power Rating Breakdown

51.0

Overall

Attack 57.9
Defense 57.9
Form 32.5
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 91.4

Opponent Quality

63.1 vs 62.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Fortuna logo Fortuna
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Feyenoord (67%)
L
Heerenveen (72%)
D
NAC (49%)
L
AZ (72%)
L
Twente (76%)
W
Volendam (54%)
L
Telstar (64%)
Betis logo Betis
W
Elche (61%)
D
Real Sociedad (66%)
W
Oviedo (61%)
D
Real Madrid (65%)
W
Girona (64%)
L
Braga (66%)
D
Osasuna (63%)
D
Braga (71%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zwolle H
3 - 2 W
54%
Feyenoord H
1 - 2 L
67%
Heerenveen A
1 - 2 L
72%
NAC H
1 - 1 D
49%
AZ A
0 - 2 L
72%
Twente H
1 - 2 L
76%
Volendam A
2 - 1 W
54%
Telstar H
1 - 4 L
64%
NEC A
3 - 2 W
69%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Elche H
2 - 1 W
61%
Real Sociedad A
2 - 2 D
66%
Oviedo H
3 - 0 W
61%
Real Madrid H
1 - 1 D
65%
Girona A
3 - 2 W
64%
Braga H
2 - 4 L
66%
Osasuna A
1 - 1 D
63%
Braga A
1 - 1 D
71%
Espanyol H
0 - 0 D
50%
Athletic A
1 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.1 vs 58.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Fortuna averaging 1.5 and Betis averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Betis has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Fortuna's 1.9.

Fortuna has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Betis has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fortuna

Fortuna

VS
Betis

Betis

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more