Skip to content
Compare Fredericia vs Antwerp

Fredericia vs Antwerp Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fredericia vs Antwerp: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fredericia Fredericia Home Team
Antwerp Antwerp Away Team
Fredericia
38.8
L D L D D D L W L W

Last 10 Matches

Antwerp
41.9
L L W W W L L L D D

Categories Won

4

Fredericia

4

Draw

7

Antwerp

Performance Radar

Fredericia
Antwerp

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Etim (4 goals)
C. Scott (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 52.6

56.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.38

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.08

1.15

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
38.8

Attack: 44.9, Defense: 38.0, Form: 20.7

41.9

Attack: 39.0, Defense: 53.1, Form: 31.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

4
Fredericia
Antwerp
Fredericia

Power Rating Breakdown

38.8

Overall

Attack 44.9
Defense 38.0
Form 20.7
Consistency 64.0
Antwerp

Power Rating Breakdown

41.9

Overall

Attack 39.0
Defense 53.1
Form 31.9
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

52.6 vs 54.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Fredericia logo Fredericia
L
Vejle (44%)
D
Copenhagen (63%)
L
OB (50%)
D
Randers (52%)
D
Silkeborg (57%)
D
Vejle (39%)
L
OB (55%)
W
Copenhagen (68%)
Antwerp logo Antwerp
L
Charleroi (46%)
L
Standard (55%)
W
Westerlo (50%)
W
Standard (60%)
W
OHL (35%)
L
Charleroi (62%)
L
Genk (61%)
L
OHL (52%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Vejle A
0 - 2 L
44%
Copenhagen H
3 - 3 D
63%
OB H
0 - 2 L
50%
Randers A
2 - 2 D
52%
Silkeborg A
2 - 2 D
57%
Vejle H
2 - 2 D
39%
OB A
0 - 1 L
55%
Copenhagen A
2 - 1 W
68%
Randers H
0 - 3 L
46%
Silkeborg H
2 - 1 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Charleroi H
0 - 1 L
46%
Standard H
0 - 5 L
55%
Westerlo A
4 - 2 W
50%
Standard A
2 - 1 W
60%
OHL H
2 - 0 W
35%
Charleroi A
1 - 2 L
62%
Genk H
1 - 2 L
61%
OHL A
0 - 1 L
52%
Standard H
1 - 1 D
67%
La Louvière A
0 - 0 D
54%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.6 vs 56.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Fredericia averaging 1.3 and Antwerp averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Antwerp has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Fredericia's 1.9.

Fredericia has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Antwerp has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fredericia

Fredericia

VS
Antwerp

Antwerp

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more