Skip to content
Compare Gaziantep vs Fortuna

Gaziantep vs Fortuna Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gaziantep vs Fortuna: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gaziantep Gaziantep Home Team
Fortuna Fortuna Away Team
Gaziantep
38.7
L L L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Fortuna
43.6
W L L D L L W L W W

Categories Won

3

Gaziantep

3

Draw

9

Fortuna

Performance Radar

Gaziantep
Fortuna

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Bayo (5 goals)
K. Sierhuis (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.9

54.1

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.11

1.77

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 39.8, Defense: 46.4, Form: 19.9

43.6

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 38.2, Form: 41.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

4

31-45'

1
5

46-60'

6
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

Gaziantep
Fortuna
Gaziantep

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 39.8
Defense 46.4
Form 19.9
Consistency 61.3
Fortuna

Power Rating Breakdown

43.6

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 38.2
Form 41.6
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

58.9 vs 63.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gaziantep logo Gaziantep
L
Göztepe (64%)
L
Beşiktaş (60%)
L
Eyüp (58%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Rize (64%)
D
Alanyaspor (56%)
L
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Antalyaspor (48%)
Fortuna logo Fortuna
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Feyenoord (67%)
L
Heerenveen (72%)
D
NAC (49%)
L
AZ (72%)
L
Twente (76%)
W
Volendam (54%)
L
Telstar (64%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Göztepe A
1 - 2 L
64%
Beşiktaş H
0 - 2 L
60%
Eyüp A
0 - 3 L
58%
Kayseri H
3 - 0 W
44%
Rize A
1 - 2 L
64%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 1 D
56%
Fenerbahçe A
1 - 4 L
73%
Antalyaspor A
4 - 1 W
48%
Fatih H
1 - 1 D
55%
Samsunspor A
0 - 0 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zwolle H
3 - 2 W
54%
Feyenoord H
1 - 2 L
67%
Heerenveen A
1 - 2 L
72%
NAC H
1 - 1 D
49%
AZ A
0 - 2 L
72%
Twente H
1 - 2 L
76%
Volendam A
2 - 1 W
54%
Telstar H
1 - 4 L
64%
NEC A
3 - 2 W
69%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.4 vs 54.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Fortuna holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus Gaziantep's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Gaziantep conceding 1.6 and Fortuna conceding 1.9 per match.

Fortuna has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gaziantep

Gaziantep

VS
Fortuna

Fortuna

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more