Skip to content
Compare Gaziantep vs Istra

Gaziantep vs Istra Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gaziantep vs Istra: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gaziantep Gaziantep Home Team
Istra Istra Away Team
Gaziantep
38.7
L L L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Istra
35.8
W W L L L L L W W L

Categories Won

7

Gaziantep

3

Draw

5

Istra

Performance Radar

Gaziantep
Istra

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Bayo (5 goals)
S. Prevljak (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.9

34.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.11

0.93

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 39.8, Defense: 46.4, Form: 19.9

35.8

Attack: 28.2, Defense: 47.9, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
5

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

3
Gaziantep
Istra
Gaziantep

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 39.8
Defense 46.4
Form 19.9
Consistency 61.3
Istra

Power Rating Breakdown

35.8

Overall

Attack 28.2
Defense 47.9
Form 33.8
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

58.9 vs 47.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gaziantep logo Gaziantep
L
Göztepe (64%)
L
Beşiktaş (60%)
L
Eyüp (58%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Rize (64%)
D
Alanyaspor (56%)
L
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Antalyaspor (48%)
Istra logo Istra
W
Osijek (46%)
W
Slaven (35%)
L
Gorica (50%)
L
Dinamo Zagreb (71%)
L
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
L
Hajduk (53%)
W
Varaždin (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Göztepe A
1 - 2 L
64%
Beşiktaş H
0 - 2 L
60%
Eyüp A
0 - 3 L
58%
Kayseri H
3 - 0 W
44%
Rize A
1 - 2 L
64%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 1 D
56%
Fenerbahçe A
1 - 4 L
73%
Antalyaspor A
4 - 1 W
48%
Fatih H
1 - 1 D
55%
Samsunspor A
0 - 0 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Osijek A
1 - 0 W
46%
Slaven H
3 - 1 W
35%
Gorica A
0 - 1 L
50%
Dinamo Zagreb H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vukovar H
1 - 2 L
32%
Lokomotiva A
0 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
1 - 3 L
53%
Varaždin H
2 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
2 - 0 W
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Gaziantep has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 49.4) compared to Istra (SoS: 34.5). This means Gaziantep's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Gaziantep averaging 1.2 and Istra averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Istra has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Gaziantep's 1.6.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gaziantep

Gaziantep

VS
Istra

Istra

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more