Skip to content
Compare Gaziantep vs Motor

Gaziantep vs Motor Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gaziantep vs Motor: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gaziantep Gaziantep Home Team
Motor Motor Away Team
Gaziantep
38.7
L L L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Motor
52.1
W L L L D D W W D W

Categories Won

2

Gaziantep

3

Draw

10

Motor

Performance Radar

Gaziantep
Motor

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Bayo (5 goals)
K. Czubak (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.9

54.7

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.11

1.37

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 39.8, Defense: 46.4, Form: 19.9

52.1

Attack: 45.4, Defense: 73.3, Form: 41.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

4

31-45'

3
5

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

2
Gaziantep
Motor
Gaziantep

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 39.8
Defense 46.4
Form 19.9
Consistency 61.3
Motor

Power Rating Breakdown

52.1

Overall

Attack 45.4
Defense 73.3
Form 41.9
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

58.9 vs 53.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gaziantep logo Gaziantep
L
Göztepe (64%)
L
Beşiktaş (60%)
L
Eyüp (58%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Rize (64%)
D
Alanyaspor (56%)
L
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Antalyaspor (48%)
Motor logo Motor
W
Wisła Płock (47%)
L
Lech (64%)
L
Widzew (59%)
L
GKS Katowice (64%)
D
Raków (54%)
D
Radomiak (58%)
W
Zagłębie (49%)
W
Nieciecza (41%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Göztepe A
1 - 2 L
64%
Beşiktaş H
0 - 2 L
60%
Eyüp A
0 - 3 L
58%
Kayseri H
3 - 0 W
44%
Rize A
1 - 2 L
64%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 1 D
56%
Fenerbahçe A
1 - 4 L
73%
Antalyaspor A
4 - 1 W
48%
Fatih H
1 - 1 D
55%
Samsunspor A
0 - 0 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Wisła Płock A
4 - 0 W
47%
Lech H
0 - 1 L
64%
Widzew A
0 - 2 L
59%
GKS Katowice A
2 - 3 L
64%
Raków H
1 - 1 D
54%
Radomiak A
1 - 1 D
58%
Zagłębie H
1 - 0 W
49%
Nieciecza A
2 - 1 W
41%
Górnik H
0 - 0 D
53%
Kielce H
2 - 0 W
43%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.4 vs 54.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Gaziantep averaging 1.2 and Motor averaging 1.3 goals per match.

Motor has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Gaziantep's 1.6.

Motor has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Motor has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gaziantep

Gaziantep

VS
Motor

Motor

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more