Skip to content
Compare Gaziantep vs NEC

Gaziantep vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gaziantep vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gaziantep Gaziantep Home Team
NEC NEC Away Team
Gaziantep
38.7
L L L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

2

Gaziantep

3

Draw

10

NEC

Performance Radar

Gaziantep
NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Bayo (5 goals)
B. Linssen (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.9

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.11

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 39.8, Defense: 46.4, Form: 19.9

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2

16-30'

4

31-45'

3
5

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Gaziantep
NEC
Gaziantep

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 39.8
Defense 46.4
Form 19.9
Consistency 61.3
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

58.9 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
Gaziantep logo Gaziantep
L
Göztepe (64%)
L
Beşiktaş (60%)
L
Eyüp (58%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Rize (64%)
D
Alanyaspor (56%)
L
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Antalyaspor (48%)
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Göztepe A
1 - 2 L
64%
Beşiktaş H
0 - 2 L
60%
Eyüp A
0 - 3 L
58%
Kayseri H
3 - 0 W
44%
Rize A
1 - 2 L
64%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 1 D
56%
Fenerbahçe A
1 - 4 L
73%
Antalyaspor A
4 - 1 W
48%
Fatih H
1 - 1 D
55%
Samsunspor A
0 - 0 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Gaziantep (SoS: 49.4). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Gaziantep's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

NEC has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Gaziantep's 1.6.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.6 vs 38.7) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gaziantep

Gaziantep

VS
NEC

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more