Skip to content
Compare Gaziantep vs Radomiak

Gaziantep vs Radomiak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gaziantep vs Radomiak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gaziantep Gaziantep Home Team
Radomiak Radomiak Away Team
Gaziantep
38.7
L L L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Radomiak
49.9
D W W W L D L D L W

Categories Won

2

Gaziantep

5

Draw

8

Radomiak

Performance Radar

Gaziantep
Radomiak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Bayo (5 goals)
R. Wolski (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.9

54.0

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 52.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.11

1.12

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 39.8, Defense: 46.4, Form: 19.9

49.9

Attack: 41.6, Defense: 69.3, Form: 41.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
5

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

3
Gaziantep
Radomiak
Gaziantep

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 39.8
Defense 46.4
Form 19.9
Consistency 61.3
Radomiak

Power Rating Breakdown

49.9

Overall

Attack 41.6
Defense 69.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

58.9 vs 52.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gaziantep logo Gaziantep
L
Göztepe (64%)
L
Beşiktaş (60%)
L
Eyüp (58%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Rize (64%)
D
Alanyaspor (56%)
L
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Antalyaspor (48%)
Radomiak logo Radomiak
D
Cracovia (45%)
W
Lechia (46%)
W
Wisła Płock (47%)
W
Widzew (54%)
L
Zagłębie (54%)
D
Motor (54%)
L
Piast (58%)
D
Legia (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Göztepe A
1 - 2 L
64%
Beşiktaş H
0 - 2 L
60%
Eyüp A
0 - 3 L
58%
Kayseri H
3 - 0 W
44%
Rize A
1 - 2 L
64%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 1 D
56%
Fenerbahçe A
1 - 4 L
73%
Antalyaspor A
4 - 1 W
48%
Fatih H
1 - 1 D
55%
Samsunspor A
0 - 0 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cracovia A
0 - 0 D
45%
Lechia H
3 - 1 W
46%
Wisła Płock A
1 - 0 W
47%
Widzew H
2 - 1 W
54%
Zagłębie A
0 - 1 L
54%
Motor H
1 - 1 D
54%
Piast A
1 - 3 L
58%
Legia H
1 - 1 D
59%
GKS Katowice H
0 - 1 L
59%
Arka H
3 - 1 W
44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.4 vs 54.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Gaziantep averaging 1.2 and Radomiak averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Radomiak has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Gaziantep's 1.6.

Radomiak has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Radomiak has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gaziantep

Gaziantep

VS
Radomiak

Radomiak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more