Skip to content
Compare Gaziantep vs Volendam

Gaziantep vs Volendam Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gaziantep vs Volendam: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gaziantep Gaziantep Home Team
Volendam Volendam Away Team
Gaziantep
38.7
L L L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Volendam
36.2
D L W L D L L L W L

Categories Won

7

Gaziantep

6

Draw

2

Volendam

Performance Radar

Gaziantep
Volendam

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Bayo (5 goals)
R. Mühren (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.9

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.11

0.77

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 39.8, Defense: 46.4, Form: 19.9

36.2

Attack: 27.5, Defense: 51.6, Form: 20.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

31-45'

5

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

2
Gaziantep
Volendam
Gaziantep

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 39.8
Defense 46.4
Form 19.9
Consistency 61.3
Volendam

Power Rating Breakdown

36.2

Overall

Attack 27.5
Defense 51.6
Form 20.6
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

58.9 vs 60.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gaziantep logo Gaziantep
L
Göztepe (64%)
L
Beşiktaş (60%)
L
Eyüp (58%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Rize (64%)
D
Alanyaspor (56%)
L
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Antalyaspor (48%)
Volendam logo Volendam
D
Excelsior (60%)
L
Heerenveen (67%)
W
Heracles (41%)
L
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
L
Sparta (49%)
L
Fortuna (56%)
L
NEC (69%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Göztepe A
1 - 2 L
64%
Beşiktaş H
0 - 2 L
60%
Eyüp A
0 - 3 L
58%
Kayseri H
3 - 0 W
44%
Rize A
1 - 2 L
64%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 1 D
56%
Fenerbahçe A
1 - 4 L
73%
Antalyaspor A
4 - 1 W
48%
Fatih H
1 - 1 D
55%
Samsunspor A
0 - 0 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Excelsior A
1 - 1 D
60%
Heerenveen H
0 - 2 L
67%
Heracles A
2 - 0 W
41%
Twente A
1 - 2 L
81%
Feyenoord H
0 - 0 D
67%
Sparta A
0 - 2 L
49%
Fortuna H
1 - 2 L
56%
NEC A
0 - 3 L
69%
Groningen H
3 - 2 W
61%
NAC A
0 - 1 L
54%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.4 vs 53.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Gaziantep holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Volendam's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Gaziantep conceding 1.6 and Volendam conceding 1.5 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gaziantep

Gaziantep

VS
Volendam

Volendam

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more