Skip to content
Compare Gaziantep vs Winterthur

Gaziantep vs Winterthur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gaziantep vs Winterthur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gaziantep Gaziantep Home Team
Winterthur Winterthur Away Team
Gaziantep
38.7
L L L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Winterthur
33.7
L W D L L L L W D D

Categories Won

7

Gaziantep

4

Draw

4

Winterthur

Performance Radar

Gaziantep
Winterthur

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Bayo (5 goals)
N. Burkart (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.9

36.6

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.11

1.46

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 39.8, Defense: 46.4, Form: 19.9

33.7

Attack: 40.4, Defense: 28.9, Form: 17.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

4
5

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

1
Gaziantep
Winterthur
Gaziantep

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 39.8
Defense 46.4
Form 19.9
Consistency 61.3
Winterthur

Power Rating Breakdown

33.7

Overall

Attack 40.4
Defense 28.9
Form 17.3
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

58.9 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gaziantep logo Gaziantep
L
Göztepe (64%)
L
Beşiktaş (60%)
L
Eyüp (58%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Rize (64%)
D
Alanyaspor (56%)
L
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Antalyaspor (48%)
Winterthur logo Winterthur
L
GC Zürich (36%)
W
Lausanne (42%)
D
Zürich (37%)
L
Servette (70%)
L
GC Zürich (27%)
L
Lausanne (43%)
L
Basel (46%)
W
Luzern (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Göztepe A
1 - 2 L
64%
Beşiktaş H
0 - 2 L
60%
Eyüp A
0 - 3 L
58%
Kayseri H
3 - 0 W
44%
Rize A
1 - 2 L
64%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 1 D
56%
Fenerbahçe A
1 - 4 L
73%
Antalyaspor A
4 - 1 W
48%
Fatih H
1 - 1 D
55%
Samsunspor A
0 - 0 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
GC Zürich A
2 - 3 L
36%
Lausanne H
2 - 1 W
42%
Zürich H
2 - 2 D
37%
Servette A
3 - 5 L
70%
GC Zürich H
0 - 2 L
27%
Lausanne A
1 - 2 L
43%
Basel H
0 - 2 L
46%
Luzern A
2 - 1 W
57%
Sion A
1 - 1 D
66%
Servette H
1 - 1 D
61%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Gaziantep has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 49.4) compared to Winterthur (SoS: 36.6). This means Gaziantep's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Gaziantep averaging 1.2 and Winterthur averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Gaziantep has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Winterthur's 2.0.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Gaziantep has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gaziantep

Gaziantep

VS
Winterthur

Winterthur

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more