Skip to content
Compare Genk vs Köln

Genk vs Köln Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Genk vs Köln: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Genk Genk Home Team
Köln Köln Away Team
Genk
50.6
W L D D W D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Köln
41.1
L D L D W D D D L L

Categories Won

8

Genk

3

Draw

4

Köln

Performance Radar

Genk
Köln

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 4D, 2L

10%

1W, 5D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Bibout (4 goals)
S. El Mala (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

58.7

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 63.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

1.87

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.37

Adjusted Power Rating
50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

41.1

Attack: 54.4, Defense: 39.9, Form: 10.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

5

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

6
Genk
Köln
Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5
Defense 49.5
Form 42.4
Consistency 56.8
Köln

Power Rating Breakdown

41.1

Overall

Attack 54.4
Defense 39.9
Form 10.9
Consistency 77.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.6 vs 91.0

Opponent Quality

52.9 vs 63.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Genk logo Genk
W
Westerlo (45%)
L
Charleroi (51%)
D
Standard (55%)
D
Charleroi (46%)
W
Westerlo (50%)
D
OHL (47%)
W
Antwerp (57%)
D
La Louvière (54%)
Köln logo Köln
L
Heidenheim (62%)
D
Union Berlin (57%)
L
Leverkusen (65%)
D
St. Pauli (55%)
W
Bremen (62%)
D
Frankfurt (67%)
D
M'gladbach (63%)
D
Hamburg (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Westerlo H
3 - 0 W
45%
Charleroi A
0 - 2 L
51%
Standard H
1 - 1 D
55%
Charleroi H
1 - 1 D
46%
Westerlo A
2 - 1 W
50%
OHL H
0 - 0 D
47%
Antwerp A
2 - 1 W
57%
La Louvière A
5 - 5 D
54%
Freiburg A
1 - 5 L
69%
Sint-Truiden H
1 - 0 W
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heidenheim H
1 - 3 L
62%
Union Berlin A
2 - 2 D
57%
Leverkusen H
1 - 2 L
65%
St. Pauli A
1 - 1 D
55%
Bremen H
3 - 1 W
62%
Frankfurt A
2 - 2 D
67%
M'gladbach H
3 - 3 D
63%
Hamburg A
1 - 1 D
63%
Dortmund H
1 - 2 L
71%
Augsburg A
0 - 2 L
71%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 56.0 vs 58.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Genk averaging 1.6 and Köln averaging 1.5 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Genk conceding 1.6 and Köln conceding 1.9 per match.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Genk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Genk

Genk

VS
Köln

Köln

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more