Compare Genk vs Lausanne

Genk vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Genk vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Genk Home Team

Lausanne Away Team

Genk

50.6

W L D D W D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne

33.3

L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

Genk

Draw

Lausanne

Performance Radar

Genk

Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

A. Bibout (4 goals)

Omar Janneh (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Genk

Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5

Defense 49.5

Form 42.4

Consistency 56.8

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7

Defense 28.9

Form 34.7

Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.6 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

52.9 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Genk

Lausanne

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Westerlo H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 0 W

45%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

51%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

55%

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

46%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

50%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

47%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

57%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

5 - 5 D

54%

Freiburg A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 5 L

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

55%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Servette A

Swiss Super League

0 - 2 L

70%

Winterthur A

Swiss Super League

1 - 2 L

46%

Luzern H

Swiss Super League

1 - 3 L

56%

Zürich H

Swiss Super League

3 - 0 W

37%

Sion A

Brack Super League

0 - 3 L

66%

Winterthur H

Brack Super League

2 - 1 W

38%

Luzern A

Brack Super League

0 - 4 L

57%

Young Boys H

Brack Super League

0 - 2 L

50%

GC Zürich A

Brack Super League

3 - 2 W

32%

Zürich A

Brack Super League

2 - 1 W

38%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Genk has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.0) compared to Lausanne (SoS: 36.8). This means Genk's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Genk holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Lausanne's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Genk has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Lausanne's 2.0.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Genk emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (50.6 vs 33.3) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Genk

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair