Compare Genk vs NEC

Genk vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Genk vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Genk Home Team

NEC Away Team

Genk

50.6

W L D D W D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

NEC

56.6

L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

Genk

Draw

NEC

Performance Radar

Genk

NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

A. Bibout (4 goals)

B. Linssen (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Genk

NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5

Defense 49.5

Form 42.4

Consistency 56.8

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6

Defense 66.6

Form 35.2

Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.6 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

52.9 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%

Genk

NEC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Westerlo H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 0 W

45%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

51%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

55%

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

46%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

50%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

47%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

57%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

5 - 5 D

54%

Freiburg A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 5 L

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

55%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

66%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

64%

Twente A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

81%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

Excelsior A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

60%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

67%

PSV A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

80%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

49%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 3 L

56%

Ajax A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Genk (SoS: 56.0). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Genk averaging 1.6 and NEC averaging 1.7 goals per match.

NEC has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Genk's 1.6.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Genk

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair