Skip to content
Compare Genoa vs NAC

Genoa vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Genoa vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Genoa Genoa Home Team
NAC NAC Away Team
Genoa
47.7
D D L W W L L W W L

Last 10 Matches

NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Categories Won

8

Genoa

5

Draw

2

NAC

Performance Radar

Genoa
NAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-11

-11

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Vítinha (2 goals)
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
64.4

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 68.9

53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

Elite Opponent Record
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.85

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.05

0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

Adjusted Power Rating
47.7

Attack: 30.5, Defense: 72.5, Form: 45.8

33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

2
Genoa
NAC
Genoa

Power Rating Breakdown

47.7

Overall

Attack 30.5
Defense 72.5
Form 45.8
Consistency 44.8
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

90.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

68.9 vs 62.3

Elite Opponent Record

17% vs 0%
Genoa logo Genoa
D
Fiorentina (71%)
D
Atalanta (69%)
L
Como (71%)
W
Pisa (46%)
W
Sassuolo (64%)
L
Juventus (85%)
L
Udinese (74%)
W
Verona (55%)
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fiorentina A
0 - 0 D
71%
Atalanta A
0 - 0 D
69%
Como H
0 - 2 L
71%
Pisa A
2 - 1 W
46%
Sassuolo H
2 - 1 W
64%
Juventus A
0 - 2 L
85%
Udinese H
0 - 2 L
74%
Verona A
2 - 0 W
55%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Inter Milan A
0 - 2 L
84%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Genoa has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 64.4) compared to NAC (SoS: 53.8). This means Genoa's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Genoa averaging 0.8 and NAC averaging 0.8 goals per match.

Genoa has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to NAC's 1.9.

Genoa has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being unlikely.

Genoa has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Genoa

Genoa

VS
NAC

NAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more