Compare Gent vs Malmö

Gent vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gent vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gent Home Team

Malmö Away Team

Gent

46.6

D L L D D L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Malmö

39.9

L L W L W W D L L L

Categories Won

Gent

Draw

Malmö

Performance Radar

Gent

Malmö

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Dean (4 goals)

S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7

Home Win Rate

33%

2W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.6

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 49.6

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.82

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.28

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating

46.6

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 69.1, Form: 31.1

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Gent

Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

46.6

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 69.1

Form 31.1

Consistency 57.7

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4

Defense 44.4

Form 28.6

Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 60.5

Opponent Quality

49.6 vs 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Gent

Malmö

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Anderlecht H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

35%

Mechelen A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 1 L

34%

Club Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

66%

R. Union SG A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 0 D

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 0 D

44%

Anderlecht A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

52%

Mechelen H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

40%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

51%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 0 W

65%

Mechelen H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Häcken A

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

58%

Mjällby H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

54%

AIK A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

49%

Sirius H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

65%

Djurgården A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

59%

GAIS H

Swedish Allsvenskan

3 - 1 W

47%

Örgryte A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 1 D

41%

Genk A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

70%

Red Star H

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

81%

Porto A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

77%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.6 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Gent averaging 1.1 and Malmö averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Gent has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Malmö's 1.6.

Gent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Gent has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gent

Malmö

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair