Skip to content
Compare GC Zürich vs Cremonese

GC Zürich vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare GC Zürich vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

GC Zürich GC Zürich Home Team
Cremonese Cremonese Away Team
GC Zürich
27.5
L L L W L L L L L W

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

1

GC Zürich

5

Draw

9

Cremonese

Performance Radar

GC Zürich
Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 0D, 8L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Frey (1 goals)
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.7

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.76

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.04

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
27.5

Attack: 26.6, Defense: 19.9, Form: 19.9

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

2
GC Zürich
Cremonese
GC Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

27.5

Overall

Attack 26.6
Defense 19.9
Form 19.9
Consistency 56.8
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

48.0 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
GC Zürich logo GC Zürich
L
Zürich (41%)
L
Servette (62%)
L
Luzern (51%)
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Sion (62%)
L
Servette (63%)
L
Thun (49%)
L
Lausanne (38%)
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
41%
Servette H
0 - 2 L
62%
Luzern H
1 - 2 L
51%
Winterthur A
2 - 0 W
42%
Sion H
0 - 4 L
62%
Servette A
0 - 5 L
63%
Thun A
1 - 5 L
49%
Lausanne H
2 - 3 L
38%
Basel A
0 - 1 L
51%
Lugano H
1 - 0 W
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.7 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with GC Zürich averaging 0.8 and Cremonese averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Cremonese has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to GC Zürich's 2.4.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Cremonese has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

GC Zürich

GC Zürich

VS
Cremonese

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more