Skip to content
Compare GC Zürich vs Go Ahead

GC Zürich vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare GC Zürich vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

GC Zürich GC Zürich Home Team
Go Ahead Go Ahead Away Team
GC Zürich
27.8
W L L L W L L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead
56.1
L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

2

GC Zürich

2

Draw

11

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

GC Zürich
Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 0D, 8L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.6

26 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
D. Abels (3 goals)
J. Breum (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.7

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.99

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.01

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
27.8

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 13.3, Form: 19.9

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

4
1

76-90+'

3
GC Zürich
Go Ahead
GC Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

27.8

Overall

Attack 33.2
Defense 13.3
Form 19.9
Consistency 56.8
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8
Defense 61.9
Form 41.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

50.1 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
GC Zürich logo GC Zürich
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Zürich (41%)
L
Servette (62%)
L
Luzern (51%)
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Sion (62%)
L
Servette (63%)
L
Thun (49%)
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
L
PSV (75%)
D
Sparta (49%)
D
AZ (67%)
D
Groningen (66%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
W
NAC (49%)
L
Twente (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Winterthur H
3 - 2 W
42%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
41%
Servette H
0 - 2 L
62%
Luzern H
1 - 2 L
51%
Winterthur A
2 - 0 W
42%
Sion H
0 - 4 L
62%
Servette A
0 - 5 L
63%
Thun A
1 - 5 L
49%
Lausanne H
2 - 3 L
38%
Basel A
0 - 1 L
51%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PSV H
1 - 4 L
75%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
49%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
67%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
66%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
54%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
49%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
76%
Excelsior A
1 - 0 W
60%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.7 vs 53.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Go Ahead's attack is on another level, averaging 2.0 goals per match with J. Breum leading the charge with 5 goals. GC Zürich manages just 1.0 per match.

Defensively, Go Ahead is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 6 clean sheets, while GC Zürich leaks 2.6 per match.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Go Ahead emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.1 vs 27.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

GC Zürich

GC Zürich

VS
Go Ahead

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more