Compare GC Zürich vs WAC

GC Zürich vs WAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare GC Zürich vs WAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

GC Zürich Home Team

WAC Away Team

GC Zürich

27.9

W L L L W L L L L L

Last 10 Matches

WAC

41.5

W W W L D D L D L L

Categories Won

GC Zürich

Draw

WAC

Performance Radar

GC Zürich

WAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 0D, 8L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

2.6

26 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-16

-4

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Abels (3 goals)

D. Baumgartner (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

50.4

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.3

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.0

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: 0.0

0.97

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

27.9

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 13.4, Form: 20.1

41.5

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 59.1, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

GC Zürich

WAC

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 33.5

Defense 13.4

Form 20.1

Consistency 56.8

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 31.3

Defense 59.1

Form 31.3

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

51.3 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

GC Zürich

WAC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Winterthur H

Swiss Super League

3 - 2 W

42%

Zürich A

Swiss Super League

1 - 2 L

42%

Servette H

Swiss Super League

0 - 2 L

65%

Luzern H

Swiss Super League

1 - 2 L

56%

Winterthur A

Brack Super League

2 - 0 W

42%

Sion H

Brack Super League

0 - 4 L

62%

Servette A

Brack Super League

0 - 5 L

66%

Thun A

Brack Super League

1 - 5 L

49%

Lausanne H

Brack Super League

2 - 3 L

38%

Basel A

Brack Super League

0 - 1 L

51%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Ried A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 0 W

55%

Altach A

Austrian Bundesliga

4 - 1 W

48%

GAK H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 0 W

53%

BW Linz A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 3 L

60%

BW Linz H

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

55%

Ried H

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

50%

WSG Tirol A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 3 L

48%

Altach H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 1 D

43%

GAK A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

58%

LASK A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 3 L

69%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 50.4 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with GC Zürich averaging 1.0 and WAC averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Defensively, WAC is far superior, conceding just 1.3 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while GC Zürich leaks 2.6 per match.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

WAC has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

WAC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

GC Zürich

WAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair