Compare GAK vs Dender

GAK vs Dender Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare GAK vs Dender: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

GAK Home Team

Dender Away Team

GAK

52.1

D W L L D L W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Categories Won

GAK

Draw

Dender

Performance Radar

GAK

Dender

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

R. Harakaté (4 goals)

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

51.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.66

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.04

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating

52.1

Attack: 57.4, Defense: 64.2, Form: 40.5

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

GAK

Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

52.1

Overall

Attack 57.4

Defense 64.2

Form 40.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

48.8 vs 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

GAK

Dender

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Altach H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

43%

WSG Tirol H

Austrian Bundesliga

4 - 0 W

44%

WAC A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

51%

Ried A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

55%

Ried H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 1 D

50%

Altach A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

48%

BW Linz H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 1 W

55%

WSG Tirol A

Austrian Bundesliga

5 - 1 W

48%

WAC H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

46%

WSG Tirol A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

48%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.3 vs 44.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

GAK holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Dender's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

GAK has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

GAK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

GAK emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (52.1 vs 33.6) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

GAK

Dender

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair