Skip to content
Compare Hajduk vs Brann

Hajduk vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hajduk vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hajduk Hajduk Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
Hajduk
48.5
L W D L D W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

8

Hajduk

3

Draw

4

Brann

Performance Radar

Hajduk
Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Livaja (5 goals)
K. Ingason (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.55

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.25

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
48.5

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 54.0, Form: 42.6

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

5
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

4
Hajduk
Brann
Hajduk

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 51.2
Defense 54.0
Form 42.6
Consistency 45.7
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hajduk logo Hajduk
L
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
W
Varaždin (48%)
D
Rijeka (48%)
L
Osijek (40%)
D
Slaven (40%)
W
Gorica (44%)
W
Istra (46%)
W
Vukovar (37%)
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dinamo Zagreb A
0 - 2 L
76%
Varaždin H
3 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
0 - 0 D
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%
Slaven A
2 - 2 D
40%
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
3 - 1 W
46%
Vukovar A
6 - 0 W
37%
Lokomotiva H
2 - 1 W
44%
Dinamo Zagreb H
1 - 3 L
71%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.3 vs 42.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Hajduk averaging 1.8 and Brann averaging 1.9 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hajduk conceding 1.1 and Brann conceding 1.4 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hajduk

Hajduk

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more