Skip to content
Compare Hajduk vs Como

Hajduk vs Como Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hajduk vs Como: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hajduk Hajduk Home Team
Como Como Away Team
Hajduk
48.5
L W D L D W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Categories Won

2

Hajduk

7

Draw

6

Como

Performance Radar

Hajduk
Como

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Livaja (5 goals)
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.55

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.25

2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

Adjusted Power Rating
48.5

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 54.0, Form: 42.6

62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
4

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Hajduk
Como
Hajduk

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 51.2
Defense 54.0
Form 42.6
Consistency 45.7
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 85.5

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 65.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%
Hajduk logo Hajduk
L
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
W
Varaždin (48%)
D
Rijeka (48%)
L
Osijek (40%)
D
Slaven (40%)
W
Gorica (44%)
W
Istra (46%)
W
Vukovar (37%)
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dinamo Zagreb A
0 - 2 L
76%
Varaždin H
3 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
0 - 0 D
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%
Slaven A
2 - 2 D
40%
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
3 - 1 W
46%
Vukovar A
6 - 0 W
37%
Lokomotiva H
2 - 1 W
44%
Dinamo Zagreb H
1 - 3 L
71%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Como has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.4) compared to Hajduk (SoS: 35.3). This means Como's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Hajduk averaging 1.8 and Como averaging 1.8 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hajduk conceding 1.1 and Como conceding 1.1 per match.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Como has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hajduk

Hajduk

VS
Como

Como

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more