Skip to content
Compare Hajduk vs Radnički Niš

Hajduk vs Radnički Niš Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hajduk vs Radnički Niš: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hajduk Hajduk Home Team
Radnički Niš Radnički Niš Away Team
Hajduk
48.5
L W D L D W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Radnički Niš
36.1
W W L W D L L L L D

Categories Won

10

Hajduk

4

Draw

1

Radnički Niš

Performance Radar

Hajduk
Radnički Niš

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Livaja (5 goals)
A. Shestyuk (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.55

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.25

1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
48.5

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 54.0, Form: 42.6

36.1

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4

16-30'

3

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

2
Hajduk
Radnički Niš
Hajduk

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 51.2
Defense 54.0
Form 42.6
Consistency 45.7
Radnički Niš

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 33.2
Defense 42.3
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 53.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hajduk logo Hajduk
L
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
W
Varaždin (48%)
D
Rijeka (48%)
L
Osijek (40%)
D
Slaven (40%)
W
Gorica (44%)
W
Istra (46%)
W
Vukovar (37%)
Radnički Niš logo Radnički Niš
W
Mladost Lučani (48%)
W
Napredak (34%)
L
FK IMT (63%)
W
Javor (52%)
D
Radnički Krag (57%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)
L
OFK (53%)
L
Red Star (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dinamo Zagreb A
0 - 2 L
76%
Varaždin H
3 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
0 - 0 D
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%
Slaven A
2 - 2 D
40%
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
3 - 1 W
46%
Vukovar A
6 - 0 W
37%
Lokomotiva H
2 - 1 W
44%
Dinamo Zagreb H
1 - 3 L
71%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mladost Lučani H
1 - 0 W
48%
Napredak A
1 - 0 W
34%
FK IMT A
0 - 2 L
63%
Javor H
3 - 2 W
52%
Radnički Krag A
1 - 1 D
57%
Vojvodina A
2 - 3 L
68%
OFK H
1 - 2 L
53%
Red Star A
0 - 2 L
74%
Spartak H
0 - 2 L
28%
Radnik A
2 - 2 D
55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.3 vs 40.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Hajduk holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Radnički Niš's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Hajduk has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Radnički Niš's 1.6.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Hajduk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hajduk

Hajduk

VS
Radnički Niš

Radnički Niš

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more