Skip to content
Compare Hajduk vs Randers

Hajduk vs Randers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hajduk vs Randers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hajduk Hajduk Home Team
Randers Randers Away Team
Hajduk
48.5
L W D L D W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Randers
42.7
D W L D L L D L W W

Categories Won

9

Hajduk

3

Draw

3

Randers

Performance Radar

Hajduk
Randers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Livaja (5 goals)
E. Mahmoud (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

53.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.55

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.25

1.15

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
48.5

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 54.0, Form: 42.6

42.7

Attack: 44.7, Defense: 48.1, Form: 30.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
4

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

4

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

2
Hajduk
Randers
Hajduk

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 51.2
Defense 54.0
Form 42.6
Consistency 45.7
Randers

Power Rating Breakdown

42.7

Overall

Attack 44.7
Defense 48.1
Form 30.9
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 51.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hajduk logo Hajduk
L
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
W
Varaždin (48%)
D
Rijeka (48%)
L
Osijek (40%)
D
Slaven (40%)
W
Gorica (44%)
W
Istra (46%)
W
Vukovar (37%)
Randers logo Randers
D
OB (50%)
W
Vejle (39%)
L
Silkeborg (57%)
D
Fredericia (43%)
L
OB (55%)
L
Copenhagen (63%)
D
Vejle (44%)
L
Silkeborg (52%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dinamo Zagreb A
0 - 2 L
76%
Varaždin H
3 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
0 - 0 D
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%
Slaven A
2 - 2 D
40%
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
3 - 1 W
46%
Vukovar A
6 - 0 W
37%
Lokomotiva H
2 - 1 W
44%
Dinamo Zagreb H
1 - 3 L
71%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OB H
2 - 2 D
50%
Vejle H
1 - 0 W
39%
Silkeborg A
0 - 2 L
57%
Fredericia H
2 - 2 D
43%
OB A
1 - 3 L
55%
Copenhagen H
1 - 2 L
63%
Vejle A
1 - 1 D
44%
Silkeborg H
0 - 3 L
52%
Fredericia A
3 - 0 W
48%
Copenhagen A
2 - 1 W
68%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Randers has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.1) compared to Hajduk (SoS: 35.3). This means Randers's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Hajduk holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Randers's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Hajduk has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Randers's 1.6.

Randers has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Hajduk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hajduk

Hajduk

VS
Randers

Randers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more