Compare Hajduk vs Charleroi

Hajduk vs Charleroi Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hajduk vs Charleroi: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hajduk Home Team

Charleroi Away Team

Hajduk

48.5

L W D L D W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Charleroi

42.5

W W W D L W L L L D

Categories Won

Hajduk

Draw

Charleroi

Performance Radar

Hajduk

Charleroi

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Livaja (5 goals)

A. Bernier (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

35.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

42.2

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 52.5

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.55

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.25

1.03

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

48.5

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 54.0, Form: 42.6

42.5

Attack: 33.8, Defense: 58.4, Form: 36.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Hajduk

Charleroi

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 51.2

Defense 54.0

Form 42.6

Consistency 45.7

Power Rating Breakdown

42.5

Overall

Attack 33.8

Defense 58.4

Form 36.9

Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 52.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Hajduk

Charleroi

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Dinamo Zagreb A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 2 L

76%

Varaždin H

Croatia Prva HNL

3 - 1 W

48%

Rijeka A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 0 D

48%

Osijek H

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 1 L

40%

Slaven A

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 2 D

40%

Gorica H

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 0 W

44%

Istra A

Croatia Prva HNL

3 - 1 W

46%

Vukovar A

Croatia Prva HNL

6 - 0 W

37%

Lokomotiva H

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 1 W

44%

Dinamo Zagreb H

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 3 L

71%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Antwerp A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 0 W

45%

Genk H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

49%

OHL A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

40%

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

54%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

55%

Antwerp H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

52%

Westerlo A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

62%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

70%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

47%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

51%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.3 vs 42.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Hajduk holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Charleroi's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hajduk conceding 1.1 and Charleroi conceding 1.1 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Hajduk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hajduk

Charleroi

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair