Skip to content
Compare Hajduk vs Winterthur

Hajduk vs Winterthur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hajduk vs Winterthur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hajduk Hajduk Home Team
Winterthur Winterthur Away Team
Hajduk
48.5
L W D L D W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Winterthur
33.7
L W D L L L L W D D

Categories Won

10

Hajduk

3

Draw

2

Winterthur

Performance Radar

Hajduk
Winterthur

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Livaja (5 goals)
N. Burkart (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

36.6

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.55

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.25

1.46

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
48.5

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 54.0, Form: 42.6

33.7

Attack: 40.4, Defense: 28.9, Form: 17.3

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
4

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

1
Hajduk
Winterthur
Hajduk

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 51.2
Defense 54.0
Form 42.6
Consistency 45.7
Winterthur

Power Rating Breakdown

33.7

Overall

Attack 40.4
Defense 28.9
Form 17.3
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hajduk logo Hajduk
L
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
W
Varaždin (48%)
D
Rijeka (48%)
L
Osijek (40%)
D
Slaven (40%)
W
Gorica (44%)
W
Istra (46%)
W
Vukovar (37%)
Winterthur logo Winterthur
L
GC Zürich (36%)
W
Lausanne (42%)
D
Zürich (37%)
L
Servette (70%)
L
GC Zürich (27%)
L
Lausanne (43%)
L
Basel (46%)
W
Luzern (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dinamo Zagreb A
0 - 2 L
76%
Varaždin H
3 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
0 - 0 D
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%
Slaven A
2 - 2 D
40%
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
3 - 1 W
46%
Vukovar A
6 - 0 W
37%
Lokomotiva H
2 - 1 W
44%
Dinamo Zagreb H
1 - 3 L
71%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
GC Zürich A
2 - 3 L
36%
Lausanne H
2 - 1 W
42%
Zürich H
2 - 2 D
37%
Servette A
3 - 5 L
70%
GC Zürich H
0 - 2 L
27%
Lausanne A
1 - 2 L
43%
Basel H
0 - 2 L
46%
Luzern A
2 - 1 W
57%
Sion A
1 - 1 D
66%
Servette H
1 - 1 D
61%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.3 vs 36.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Hajduk holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Winterthur's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Hajduk is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Winterthur leaks 2.0 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Hajduk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hajduk

Hajduk

VS
Winterthur

Winterthur

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more