Skip to content
Compare Hajduk vs WAC

Hajduk vs WAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hajduk vs WAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hajduk Hajduk Home Team
WAC WAC Away Team
Hajduk
48.5
L W D L D W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

WAC
41.5
W W W L D D L D L L

Categories Won

11

Hajduk

2

Draw

2

WAC

Performance Radar

Hajduk
WAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Livaja (5 goals)
D. Baumgartner (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.55

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.25

0.97

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
48.5

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 54.0, Form: 42.6

41.5

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 59.1, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

2
Hajduk
WAC
Hajduk

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 51.2
Defense 54.0
Form 42.6
Consistency 45.7
WAC

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 31.3
Defense 59.1
Form 31.3
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hajduk logo Hajduk
L
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
W
Varaždin (48%)
D
Rijeka (48%)
L
Osijek (40%)
D
Slaven (40%)
W
Gorica (44%)
W
Istra (46%)
W
Vukovar (37%)
WAC logo WAC
W
Ried (55%)
W
Altach (48%)
W
GAK (53%)
L
BW Linz (60%)
D
BW Linz (55%)
D
Ried (50%)
L
WSG Tirol (48%)
D
Altach (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dinamo Zagreb A
0 - 2 L
76%
Varaždin H
3 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
0 - 0 D
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%
Slaven A
2 - 2 D
40%
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
3 - 1 W
46%
Vukovar A
6 - 0 W
37%
Lokomotiva H
2 - 1 W
44%
Dinamo Zagreb H
1 - 3 L
71%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ried A
1 - 0 W
55%
Altach A
4 - 1 W
48%
GAK H
1 - 0 W
53%
BW Linz A
0 - 3 L
60%
BW Linz H
0 - 0 D
55%
Ried H
0 - 0 D
50%
WSG Tirol A
1 - 3 L
48%
Altach H
1 - 1 D
43%
GAK A
0 - 2 L
58%
LASK A
1 - 3 L
69%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

WAC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 54.3) compared to Hajduk (SoS: 35.3). This means WAC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Hajduk holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus WAC's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hajduk conceding 1.1 and WAC conceding 1.3 per match.

WAC has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Hajduk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hajduk

Hajduk

VS
WAC

WAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more