Skip to content
Compare Hamburg vs Genk

Hamburg vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hamburg vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hamburg Hamburg Home Team
Genk Genk Away Team
Hamburg
41.5
W W L L L D L D W L

Last 10 Matches

Genk
50.6
W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

4

Hamburg

3

Draw

8

Genk

Performance Radar

Hamburg
Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

0

0

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Glatzel (2 goals)
A. Bibout (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.5

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 66.0

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.67

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.37

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
41.5

Attack: 47.5, Defense: 40.2, Form: 32.9

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

5

76-90+'

3
Hamburg
Genk
Hamburg

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 47.5
Defense 40.2
Form 32.9
Consistency 49.3
Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5
Defense 49.5
Form 42.4
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

66.0 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hamburg logo Hamburg
W
Freiburg (67%)
W
Frankfurt (67%)
L
Hoffenheim (65%)
L
Bremen (67%)
L
Stuttgart (75%)
D
Augsburg (66%)
L
Dortmund (76%)
D
Köln (57%)
Genk logo Genk
W
Westerlo (45%)
L
Charleroi (51%)
D
Standard (55%)
D
Charleroi (46%)
W
Westerlo (50%)
D
OHL (47%)
W
Antwerp (57%)
D
La Louvière (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Freiburg H
3 - 2 W
67%
Frankfurt A
2 - 1 W
67%
Hoffenheim H
1 - 2 L
65%
Bremen A
1 - 3 L
67%
Stuttgart A
0 - 4 L
75%
Augsburg H
1 - 1 D
66%
Dortmund A
2 - 3 L
76%
Köln H
1 - 1 D
57%
Wolfsburg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Leverkusen H
0 - 1 L
65%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Westerlo H
3 - 0 W
45%
Charleroi A
0 - 2 L
51%
Standard H
1 - 1 D
55%
Charleroi H
1 - 1 D
46%
Westerlo A
2 - 1 W
50%
OHL H
0 - 0 D
47%
Antwerp A
2 - 1 W
57%
La Louvière A
5 - 5 D
54%
Freiburg A
1 - 5 L
69%
Sint-Truiden H
1 - 0 W
55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.5 vs 56.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Genk holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Hamburg's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hamburg conceding 1.9 and Genk conceding 1.6 per match.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Genk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hamburg

Hamburg

VS
Genk

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more