Skip to content
Compare Hamburg vs GC Zürich

Hamburg vs GC Zürich Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hamburg vs GC Zürich: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hamburg Hamburg Home Team
GC Zürich GC Zürich Away Team
Hamburg
41.5
W W L L L D L D W L

Last 10 Matches

GC Zürich
27.9
W L L L W L L L L L

Categories Won

9

Hamburg

4

Draw

2

GC Zürich

Performance Radar

Hamburg
GC Zürich

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

20%

2W, 0D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Glatzel (2 goals)
D. Abels (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.5

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 66.0

50.4

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.67

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.37

1.0

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
41.5

Attack: 47.5, Defense: 40.2, Form: 32.9

27.9

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 13.4, Form: 20.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2
5

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

3

76-90+'

1
Hamburg
GC Zürich
Hamburg

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 47.5
Defense 40.2
Form 32.9
Consistency 49.3
GC Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 33.5
Defense 13.4
Form 20.1
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

66.0 vs 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hamburg logo Hamburg
W
Freiburg (67%)
W
Frankfurt (67%)
L
Hoffenheim (65%)
L
Bremen (67%)
L
Stuttgart (75%)
D
Augsburg (66%)
L
Dortmund (76%)
D
Köln (57%)
GC Zürich logo GC Zürich
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Zürich (42%)
L
Servette (65%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Sion (62%)
L
Servette (66%)
L
Thun (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Freiburg H
3 - 2 W
67%
Frankfurt A
2 - 1 W
67%
Hoffenheim H
1 - 2 L
65%
Bremen A
1 - 3 L
67%
Stuttgart A
0 - 4 L
75%
Augsburg H
1 - 1 D
66%
Dortmund A
2 - 3 L
76%
Köln H
1 - 1 D
57%
Wolfsburg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Leverkusen H
0 - 1 L
65%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Winterthur H
3 - 2 W
42%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
42%
Servette H
0 - 2 L
65%
Luzern H
1 - 2 L
56%
Winterthur A
2 - 0 W
42%
Sion H
0 - 4 L
62%
Servette A
0 - 5 L
66%
Thun A
1 - 5 L
49%
Lausanne H
2 - 3 L
38%
Basel A
0 - 1 L
51%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.5 vs 50.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Hamburg holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus GC Zürich's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Hamburg has the defensive edge, conceding 1.9 per match compared to GC Zürich's 2.6.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Hamburg has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hamburg

Hamburg

VS
GC Zürich

GC Zürich

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more