Skip to content
Compare Hamburg vs Tondela

Hamburg vs Tondela Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hamburg vs Tondela: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hamburg Hamburg Home Team
Tondela Tondela Away Team
Hamburg
41.5
W W L L L D L D W L

Last 10 Matches

Tondela
37.0
W W D L L D L D L D

Categories Won

10

Hamburg

3

Draw

2

Tondela

Performance Radar

Hamburg
Tondela

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Glatzel (2 goals)
Rony Lopes (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.5

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 66.0

52.7

League Difficulty: 79.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.67

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.37

0.92

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
41.5

Attack: 47.5, Defense: 40.2, Form: 32.9

37.0

Attack: 30.8, Defense: 47.9, Form: 20.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

4

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1

76-90+'

3
Hamburg
Tondela
Hamburg

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 47.5
Defense 40.2
Form 32.9
Consistency 49.3
Tondela

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 30.8
Defense 47.9
Form 20.5
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 79.0

Opponent Quality

66.0 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hamburg logo Hamburg
W
Freiburg (67%)
W
Frankfurt (67%)
L
Hoffenheim (65%)
L
Bremen (67%)
L
Stuttgart (75%)
D
Augsburg (66%)
L
Dortmund (76%)
D
Köln (57%)
Tondela logo Tondela
W
Moreirense (50%)
W
Casa Pia (53%)
D
Sporting (75%)
L
Nacional (52%)
L
Porto (74%)
D
Gil Vicente (55%)
L
Vitória SC (59%)
D
AVS (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Freiburg H
3 - 2 W
67%
Frankfurt A
2 - 1 W
67%
Hoffenheim H
1 - 2 L
65%
Bremen A
1 - 3 L
67%
Stuttgart A
0 - 4 L
75%
Augsburg H
1 - 1 D
66%
Dortmund A
2 - 3 L
76%
Köln H
1 - 1 D
57%
Wolfsburg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Leverkusen H
0 - 1 L
65%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Moreirense H
2 - 0 W
50%
Casa Pia A
1 - 0 W
53%
Sporting A
2 - 2 D
75%
Nacional H
0 - 2 L
52%
Porto A
0 - 2 L
74%
Gil Vicente H
2 - 2 D
55%
Vitória SC A
0 - 5 L
59%
AVS H
0 - 0 D
59%
Rio Ave H
0 - 1 L
61%
Santa Clara H
2 - 2 D
66%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.5 vs 52.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Hamburg holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Tondela's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hamburg conceding 1.9 and Tondela conceding 1.6 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hamburg

Hamburg

VS
Tondela

Tondela

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more