Skip to content
Compare Hartberg vs GC Zürich

Hartberg vs GC Zürich Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hartberg vs GC Zürich: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hartberg Hartberg Home Team
GC Zürich GC Zürich Away Team
Hartberg
36.4
L L L W D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

GC Zürich
27.9
W L L L W L L L L L

Categories Won

6

Hartberg

4

Draw

5

GC Zürich

Performance Radar

Hartberg
GC Zürich

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

20%

2W, 0D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Havel (3 goals)
D. Abels (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 56.4

50.4

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.84

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.06

1.0

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
36.4

Attack: 31.7, Defense: 49.4, Form: 10.6

27.9

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 13.4, Form: 20.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

1

61-75'

3
1

76-90+'

1
Hartberg
GC Zürich
Hartberg

Power Rating Breakdown

36.4

Overall

Attack 31.7
Defense 49.4
Form 10.6
Consistency 75.7
GC Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 33.5
Defense 13.4
Form 20.1
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

56.4 vs 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hartberg logo Hartberg
L
Sturm (62%)
L
Austria (53%)
L
LASK (64%)
W
Rapid Vienna (53%)
D
Rapid Vienna (48%)
D
Sturm (66%)
L
RB Salzburg (46%)
L
Austria (48%)
GC Zürich logo GC Zürich
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Zürich (42%)
L
Servette (65%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Sion (62%)
L
Servette (66%)
L
Thun (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sturm H
2 - 4 L
62%
Austria A
0 - 1 L
53%
LASK H
1 - 5 L
64%
Rapid Vienna A
2 - 0 W
53%
Rapid Vienna H
2 - 2 D
48%
Sturm A
0 - 0 D
66%
RB Salzburg H
1 - 2 L
46%
Austria H
0 - 1 L
48%
LASK A
0 - 0 D
69%
BW Linz H
1 - 1 D
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Winterthur H
3 - 2 W
42%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
42%
Servette H
0 - 2 L
65%
Luzern H
1 - 2 L
56%
Winterthur A
2 - 0 W
42%
Sion H
0 - 4 L
62%
Servette A
0 - 5 L
66%
Thun A
1 - 5 L
49%
Lausanne H
2 - 3 L
38%
Basel A
0 - 1 L
51%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.8 vs 50.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Hartberg averaging 0.9 and GC Zürich averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Defensively, Hartberg is far superior, conceding just 1.6 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while GC Zürich leaks 2.6 per match.

Hartberg has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Hartberg has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hartberg

Hartberg

VS
GC Zürich

GC Zürich

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more