Compare Hartberg vs Larissa

Hartberg vs Larissa Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hartberg vs Larissa: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hartberg Home Team

Larissa Away Team

Hartberg

36.4

L L L W D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Larissa

37.4

D D D L D L L L D D

Categories Won

Hartberg

Draw

Larissa

Performance Radar

Hartberg

Larissa

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

0W, 6D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

0.9

9 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-7

-5

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

E. Havel (3 goals)

Ľ. Tupta (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

0W / 6 matches

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

55.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 56.4

55.2

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 54.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.84

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.06

0.95

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating

36.4

Attack: 31.7, Defense: 49.4, Form: 10.6

37.4

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 56.1, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Hartberg

Larissa

Power Rating Breakdown

36.4

Overall

Attack 31.7

Defense 49.4

Form 10.6

Consistency 75.7

Power Rating Breakdown

37.4

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 56.1

Form 0.0

Consistency 92.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

56.4 vs 54.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Hartberg

Larissa

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Sturm H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 4 L

62%

Austria A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

53%

LASK H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 5 L

64%

Rapid Vienna A

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

53%

Rapid Vienna H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

48%

Sturm A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

66%

RB Salzburg H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

46%

Austria H

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

48%

LASK A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

69%

BW Linz H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 1 D

55%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Panaitolikos A

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

53%

Asteras H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

56%

Panserraikos A

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

54%

Panserraikos H

Greek Super League

0 - 1 L

49%

Kifisia H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

49%

Atromitos A

Greek Super League

2 - 3 L

59%

Panaitolikos H

Greek Super League

1 - 2 L

48%

Asteras A

Greek Super League

1 - 3 L

61%

Olympiakos A

Greek Super League

0 - 0 D

61%

Asteras H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

56%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.8 vs 55.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Hartberg averaging 0.9 and Larissa averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hartberg conceding 1.6 and Larissa conceding 1.4 per match.

Hartberg has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Larissa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hartberg

Larissa

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair