Skip to content
Compare Hartberg vs Lausanne

Hartberg vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hartberg vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hartberg Hartberg Home Team
Lausanne Lausanne Away Team
Hartberg
36.4
L L L W D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

5

Hartberg

4

Draw

6

Lausanne

Performance Radar

Hartberg
Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Havel (3 goals)
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 56.4

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.84

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.06

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
36.4

Attack: 31.7, Defense: 49.4, Form: 10.6

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

3

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
Hartberg
Lausanne
Hartberg

Power Rating Breakdown

36.4

Overall

Attack 31.7
Defense 49.4
Form 10.6
Consistency 75.7
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

56.4 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hartberg logo Hartberg
L
Sturm (62%)
L
Austria (53%)
L
LASK (64%)
W
Rapid Vienna (53%)
D
Rapid Vienna (48%)
D
Sturm (66%)
L
RB Salzburg (46%)
L
Austria (48%)
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sturm H
2 - 4 L
62%
Austria A
0 - 1 L
53%
LASK H
1 - 5 L
64%
Rapid Vienna A
2 - 0 W
53%
Rapid Vienna H
2 - 2 D
48%
Sturm A
0 - 0 D
66%
RB Salzburg H
1 - 2 L
46%
Austria H
0 - 1 L
48%
LASK A
0 - 0 D
69%
BW Linz H
1 - 1 D
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Hartberg has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.8) compared to Lausanne (SoS: 36.8). This means Hartberg's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Hartberg averaging 0.9 and Lausanne averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Hartberg has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Lausanne's 2.0.

Hartberg has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hartberg

Hartberg

VS
Lausanne

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more