Compare Hartberg vs Metz

Hartberg vs Metz Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hartberg vs Metz: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hartberg Home Team

Metz Away Team

Hartberg

36.4

L L L W D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Metz

30.1

L L D L L D D L L L

Categories Won

Hartberg

Draw

Metz

Performance Radar

Hartberg

Metz

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

0W, 3D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match

0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-7

-14

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

E. Havel (3 goals)

G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

55.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 56.4

57.2

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.84

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.06

1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

Adjusted Power Rating

36.4

Attack: 31.7, Defense: 49.4, Form: 10.6

30.1

Attack: 35.7, Defense: 21.4, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Hartberg

Metz

Power Rating Breakdown

36.4

Overall

Attack 31.7

Defense 49.4

Form 10.6

Consistency 75.7

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 35.7

Defense 21.4

Form 0.0

Consistency 93.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

56.4 vs 65.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Hartberg

Metz

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Sturm H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 4 L

62%

Austria A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

53%

LASK H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 5 L

64%

Rapid Vienna A

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

53%

Rapid Vienna H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

48%

Sturm A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

66%

RB Salzburg H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

46%

Austria H

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

48%

LASK A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

69%

BW Linz H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 1 D

55%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lorient H

French Ligue 1

0 - 4 L

64%

Monaco H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

72%

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

4 - 4 D

58%

Paris FC H

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

72%

Marseille A

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

66%

Nantes H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

51%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

80%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

3 - 4 L

57%

Lens A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

76%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

56%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.8 vs 57.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Hartberg averaging 0.9 and Metz averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Hartberg has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Metz's 2.4.

Hartberg has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Metz has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Hartberg has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hartberg

Metz

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair