Skip to content
Compare Hartberg vs SK Poltava

Hartberg vs SK Poltava Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hartberg vs SK Poltava: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hartberg Hartberg Home Team
SK Poltava SK Poltava Away Team
Hartberg
36.4
L L L W D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

SK Poltava
23.0
L D L D L D L L L L

Categories Won

9

Hartberg

3

Draw

3

SK Poltava

Performance Radar

Hartberg
SK Poltava

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

0%

0W, 3D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.9

29 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-22

-22

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Havel (3 goals)
V. Sad (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 56.4

64.1

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.84

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.06

0.94

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
36.4

Attack: 31.7, Defense: 49.4, Form: 10.6

23.0

Attack: 26.6, Defense: 3.8, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

Hartberg
SK Poltava
Hartberg

Power Rating Breakdown

36.4

Overall

Attack 31.7
Defense 49.4
Form 10.6
Consistency 75.7
SK Poltava

Power Rating Breakdown

23.0

Overall

Attack 26.6
Defense 3.8
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

56.4 vs 71.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hartberg logo Hartberg
L
Sturm (62%)
L
Austria (53%)
L
LASK (64%)
W
Rapid Vienna (53%)
D
Rapid Vienna (48%)
D
Sturm (66%)
L
RB Salzburg (46%)
L
Austria (48%)
SK Poltava logo SK Poltava
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
D
Kryvbas KR (71%)
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Obolon (63%)
L
Polissya (77%)
D
Oleksandria (44%)
L
Metalist 1925 (79%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (81%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sturm H
2 - 4 L
62%
Austria A
0 - 1 L
53%
LASK H
1 - 5 L
64%
Rapid Vienna A
2 - 0 W
53%
Rapid Vienna H
2 - 2 D
48%
Sturm A
0 - 0 D
66%
RB Salzburg H
1 - 2 L
46%
Austria H
0 - 1 L
48%
LASK A
0 - 0 D
69%
BW Linz H
1 - 1 D
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shakhtar D H
0 - 4 L
78%
Kryvbas KR H
3 - 3 D
71%
Kolos A
0 - 2 L
83%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
63%
Polissya H
0 - 4 L
77%
Oleksandria H
3 - 3 D
44%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 2 L
79%
Karpaty Lviv H
0 - 4 L
81%
Zorya A
0 - 4 L
80%
Kudrivka H
0 - 2 L
55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.8 vs 64.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Hartberg averaging 0.9 and SK Poltava averaging 0.7 goals per match.

Defensively, Hartberg is far superior, conceding just 1.6 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while SK Poltava leaks 2.9 per match.

Hartberg has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

SK Poltava has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Hartberg has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hartberg

Hartberg

VS
SK Poltava

SK Poltava

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more