Skip to content
Compare Hartberg vs Westerlo

Hartberg vs Westerlo Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hartberg vs Westerlo: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hartberg Hartberg Home Team
Westerlo Westerlo Away Team
Hartberg
36.4
L L L W D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Westerlo
45.7
L D L W L W W D L W

Categories Won

1

Hartberg

2

Draw

12

Westerlo

Performance Radar

Hartberg
Westerlo

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Havel (3 goals)
Nacho Ferri (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 56.4

51.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.84

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.06

1.42

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
36.4

Attack: 31.7, Defense: 49.4, Form: 10.6

45.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 50.6, Form: 40.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

3

61-75'

4
1

76-90+'

4
Hartberg
Westerlo
Hartberg

Power Rating Breakdown

36.4

Overall

Attack 31.7
Defense 49.4
Form 10.6
Consistency 75.7
Westerlo

Power Rating Breakdown

45.7

Overall

Attack 47.3
Defense 50.6
Form 40.5
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

56.4 vs 54.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%
Hartberg logo Hartberg
L
Sturm (62%)
L
Austria (53%)
L
LASK (64%)
W
Rapid Vienna (53%)
D
Rapid Vienna (48%)
D
Sturm (66%)
L
RB Salzburg (46%)
L
Austria (48%)
Westerlo logo Westerlo
L
Genk (54%)
D
OHL (35%)
L
Antwerp (40%)
W
OHL (40%)
L
Genk (49%)
W
Standard (72%)
W
Charleroi (57%)
D
Standard (72%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sturm H
2 - 4 L
62%
Austria A
0 - 1 L
53%
LASK H
1 - 5 L
64%
Rapid Vienna A
2 - 0 W
53%
Rapid Vienna H
2 - 2 D
48%
Sturm A
0 - 0 D
66%
RB Salzburg H
1 - 2 L
46%
Austria H
0 - 1 L
48%
LASK A
0 - 0 D
69%
BW Linz H
1 - 1 D
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Genk A
0 - 3 L
54%
OHL H
3 - 3 D
35%
Antwerp H
2 - 4 L
40%
OHL A
2 - 0 W
40%
Genk H
1 - 2 L
49%
Standard A
2 - 1 W
72%
Charleroi H
2 - 0 W
57%
Standard A
0 - 0 D
72%
Club Brugge H
1 - 2 L
78%
OHL A
1 - 0 W
52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.8 vs 51.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Westerlo holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Hartberg's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hartberg conceding 1.6 and Westerlo conceding 1.5 per match.

Hartberg has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Westerlo has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Westerlo is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Westerlo has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hartberg

Hartberg

VS
Westerlo

Westerlo

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more