Compare Heidenheim vs Antwerp

Heidenheim vs Antwerp Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs Antwerp: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Home Team

Antwerp Away Team

Heidenheim

48.6

W D W L W D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Antwerp

41.9

L L W W W L L L D D

Categories Won

Heidenheim

Draw

Antwerp

Performance Radar

Heidenheim

Antwerp

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-4

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)

C. Scott (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

56.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.2

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

1.15

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating

48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

41.9

Attack: 39.0, Defense: 53.1, Form: 31.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Heidenheim

Antwerp

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2

Defense 40.1

Form 32.8

Consistency 53.2

Power Rating Breakdown

41.9

Overall

Attack 39.0

Defense 53.1

Form 31.9

Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

65.4 vs 54.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Heidenheim

Antwerp

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Köln A

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

62%

Bayern Munich A

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

86%

St. Pauli H

German Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

50%

Freiburg A

German Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

72%

Union Berlin H

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

52%

M'gladbach A

German Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

68%

Leverkusen H

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

65%

Frankfurt A

German Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

67%

Hoffenheim H

German Bundesliga

2 - 4 L

65%

Bremen A

German Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

67%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 1 L

46%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 5 L

55%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

4 - 2 W

50%

Standard A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

60%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

35%

Charleroi A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

62%

Genk H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

61%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

52%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

67%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

54%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.3 vs 56.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Heidenheim holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Antwerp's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Antwerp has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.

Antwerp has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Heidenheim has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Antwerp

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair