Heidenheim vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Heidenheim vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Heidenheim
Home Team
Malmö
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Heidenheim
Draw
Malmö
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
3W, 1D, 6L
19 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
0
-2
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 6 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4
League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1
0W / 2 matches
0W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04
Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8
Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Heidenheim
Malmö
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Heidenheim has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.3) compared to Malmö (SoS: 45.2). This means Heidenheim's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Heidenheim holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Malmö's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.
Both defenses are comparable, with Heidenheim conceding 1.9 and Malmö conceding 1.6 per match.
Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Heidenheim has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Heidenheim
Malmö
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams