Skip to content
Compare Heidenheim vs Midtjylland

Heidenheim vs Midtjylland Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs Midtjylland: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Heidenheim Home Team
Midtjylland Midtjylland Away Team
Heidenheim
48.6
W D W L W D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Midtjylland
43.7
D D D W W W D D L L

Categories Won

7

Heidenheim

4

Draw

4

Midtjylland

Performance Radar

Heidenheim
Midtjylland

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)
M. Erlić (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

42.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

1.36

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

43.7

Attack: 40.1, Defense: 55.6, Form: 27.8

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4
4

61-75'

2
5

76-90+'

4
Heidenheim
Midtjylland
Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2
Defense 40.1
Form 32.8
Consistency 53.2
Midtjylland

Power Rating Breakdown

43.7

Overall

Attack 40.1
Defense 55.6
Form 27.8
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

65.4 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Heidenheim logo Heidenheim
W
Köln (62%)
D
Bayern Munich (86%)
W
St. Pauli (50%)
L
Freiburg (72%)
W
Union Berlin (52%)
D
M'gladbach (68%)
D
Leverkusen (65%)
L
Frankfurt (67%)
Midtjylland logo Midtjylland
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
D
Viborg (50%)
D
AGF (62%)
W
Sønderjyske (48%)
W
AGF (57%)
W
Brøndby (49%)
D
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Viborg (55%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Köln A
3 - 1 W
62%
Bayern Munich A
3 - 3 D
86%
St. Pauli H
2 - 0 W
50%
Freiburg A
1 - 2 L
72%
Union Berlin H
3 - 1 W
52%
M'gladbach A
2 - 2 D
68%
Leverkusen H
3 - 3 D
65%
Frankfurt A
0 - 1 L
67%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 4 L
65%
Bremen A
0 - 2 L
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nordsjælland A
0 - 0 D
60%
Viborg H
3 - 3 D
50%
AGF A
0 - 0 D
62%
Sønderjyske A
2 - 1 W
48%
AGF H
2 - 1 W
57%
Brøndby A
2 - 1 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 2 D
43%
Viborg A
1 - 1 D
55%
Nottm Forest H
1 - 2 L
76%
Nordsjælland H
0 - 1 L
55%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Heidenheim has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.3) compared to Midtjylland (SoS: 42.6). This means Heidenheim's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Heidenheim holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Midtjylland's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Midtjylland has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Heidenheim

VS
Midtjylland

Midtjylland

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more