Skip to content
Compare Heidenheim vs SK Poltava

Heidenheim vs SK Poltava Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs SK Poltava: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Heidenheim Home Team
SK Poltava SK Poltava Away Team
Heidenheim
48.6
W D W L W D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

SK Poltava
23.0
L D L D L D L L L L

Categories Won

12

Heidenheim

2

Draw

1

SK Poltava

Performance Radar

Heidenheim
SK Poltava

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

0%

0W, 3D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.9

29 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-22

-22

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)
V. Sad (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

64.1

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

0.94

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

23.0

Attack: 26.6, Defense: 3.8, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

1
5

76-90+'

Heidenheim
SK Poltava
Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2
Defense 40.1
Form 32.8
Consistency 53.2
SK Poltava

Power Rating Breakdown

23.0

Overall

Attack 26.6
Defense 3.8
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

65.4 vs 71.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Heidenheim logo Heidenheim
W
Köln (62%)
D
Bayern Munich (86%)
W
St. Pauli (50%)
L
Freiburg (72%)
W
Union Berlin (52%)
D
M'gladbach (68%)
D
Leverkusen (65%)
L
Frankfurt (67%)
SK Poltava logo SK Poltava
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
D
Kryvbas KR (71%)
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Obolon (63%)
L
Polissya (77%)
D
Oleksandria (44%)
L
Metalist 1925 (79%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (81%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Köln A
3 - 1 W
62%
Bayern Munich A
3 - 3 D
86%
St. Pauli H
2 - 0 W
50%
Freiburg A
1 - 2 L
72%
Union Berlin H
3 - 1 W
52%
M'gladbach A
2 - 2 D
68%
Leverkusen H
3 - 3 D
65%
Frankfurt A
0 - 1 L
67%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 4 L
65%
Bremen A
0 - 2 L
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shakhtar D H
0 - 4 L
78%
Kryvbas KR H
3 - 3 D
71%
Kolos A
0 - 2 L
83%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
63%
Polissya H
0 - 4 L
77%
Oleksandria H
3 - 3 D
44%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 2 L
79%
Karpaty Lviv H
0 - 4 L
81%
Zorya A
0 - 4 L
80%
Kudrivka H
0 - 2 L
55%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.3 vs 64.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Heidenheim's attack is on another level, averaging 1.9 goals per match with B. Zivzivadze leading the charge with 5 goals. SK Poltava manages just 0.7 per match.

Defensively, Heidenheim is far superior, conceding just 1.9 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while SK Poltava leaks 2.9 per match.

SK Poltava has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Heidenheim emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (48.6 vs 23.0) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Heidenheim

VS
SK Poltava

SK Poltava

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more