Compare Heidenheim vs Strasbourg

Heidenheim vs Strasbourg Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs Strasbourg: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Home Team

Strasbourg Away Team

Heidenheim

48.6

W D W L W D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Strasbourg

41.4

D L L L W L L W L W

Categories Won

Heidenheim

Draw

Strasbourg

Performance Radar

Heidenheim

Strasbourg

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-3

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)

J. Enciso (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

17%

1W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

52.9

League Difficulty: 78.7, Opponent Quality: 61.3

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

1.31

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.11

Adjusted Power Rating

48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

41.4

Attack: 41.2, Defense: 51.4, Form: 30.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Heidenheim

Strasbourg

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2

Defense 40.1

Form 32.8

Consistency 53.2

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 41.2

Defense 51.4

Form 30.9

Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 78.7

Opponent Quality

65.4 vs 61.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Heidenheim

Strasbourg

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Köln A

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

62%

Bayern Munich A

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

86%

St. Pauli H

German Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

50%

Freiburg A

German Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

72%

Union Berlin H

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

52%

M'gladbach A

German Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

68%

Leverkusen H

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

65%

Frankfurt A

German Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

67%

Hoffenheim H

German Bundesliga

2 - 4 L

65%

Bremen A

German Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

67%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Angers A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

52%

Rayo H

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

68%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

57%

Rayo A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

73%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

3 - 2 W

69%

Nice H

Coupe de France

0 - 2 L

39%

Rennes H

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

75%

Mainz 05 H

UEFA Conference League

4 - 0 W

60%

Mainz 05 A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 2 L

65%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.3 vs 52.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Heidenheim holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Strasbourg's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Strasbourg has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Heidenheim has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Strasbourg

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair