Skip to content
Compare Heidenheim vs Thun

Heidenheim vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Heidenheim Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Heidenheim
48.6
W D W L W D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.3
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

6

Heidenheim

4

Draw

5

Thun

Performance Radar

Heidenheim
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

37.3

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

1.36

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

41.3

Attack: 46.6, Defense: 43.6, Form: 34.9

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

3

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

4
4

61-75'

3
5

76-90+'

2
Heidenheim
Thun
Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2
Defense 40.1
Form 32.8
Consistency 53.2
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.3

Overall

Attack 46.6
Defense 43.6
Form 34.9
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

65.4 vs 50.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Heidenheim logo Heidenheim
W
Köln (62%)
D
Bayern Munich (86%)
W
St. Pauli (50%)
L
Freiburg (72%)
W
Union Berlin (52%)
D
M'gladbach (68%)
D
Leverkusen (65%)
L
Frankfurt (67%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (37%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Köln A
3 - 1 W
62%
Bayern Munich A
3 - 3 D
86%
St. Pauli H
2 - 0 W
50%
Freiburg A
1 - 2 L
72%
Union Berlin H
3 - 1 W
52%
M'gladbach A
2 - 2 D
68%
Leverkusen H
3 - 3 D
65%
Frankfurt A
0 - 1 L
67%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 4 L
65%
Bremen A
0 - 2 L
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
37%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
47%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Heidenheim has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.3) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.3). This means Heidenheim's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Heidenheim averaging 1.9 and Thun averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Thun has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Heidenheim has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Heidenheim

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more