Skip to content
Compare Heidenheim vs ZW

Heidenheim vs ZW Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs ZW: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Heidenheim Home Team
ZW ZW Away Team
Heidenheim
48.6
W D W L W D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

ZW
60.1
W W W W W D W L L L

Categories Won

5

Heidenheim

3

Draw

7

ZW

Performance Radar

Heidenheim
ZW

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)
J. Opoku (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

4
4

61-75'

5
5

76-90+'

3
Heidenheim
ZW
Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2
Defense 40.1
Form 32.8
Consistency 53.2
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7
Defense 66.8
Form 63.2
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

65.4 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Heidenheim logo Heidenheim
W
Köln (62%)
D
Bayern Munich (86%)
W
St. Pauli (50%)
L
Freiburg (72%)
W
Union Berlin (52%)
D
M'gladbach (68%)
D
Leverkusen (65%)
L
Frankfurt (67%)
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (35%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (51%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (57%)
L
Gent (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Köln A
3 - 1 W
62%
Bayern Munich A
3 - 3 D
86%
St. Pauli H
2 - 0 W
50%
Freiburg A
1 - 2 L
72%
Union Berlin H
3 - 1 W
52%
M'gladbach A
2 - 2 D
68%
Leverkusen H
3 - 3 D
65%
Frankfurt A
0 - 1 L
67%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 4 L
65%
Bremen A
0 - 2 L
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
51%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
57%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
63%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
67%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
45%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.3 vs 55.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Heidenheim averaging 1.9 and ZW averaging 1.7 goals per match.

ZW has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

ZW has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Heidenheim

VS
ZW

ZW

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more