Skip to content
Compare Verona vs Jablonec

Verona vs Jablonec Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Verona vs Jablonec: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Verona Verona Home Team
Jablonec Jablonec Away Team
Verona
36.4
L D D L L L L L W L

Last 10 Matches

Jablonec
40.7
D L L L W W L L L W

Categories Won

3

Verona

3

Draw

9

Jablonec

Performance Radar

Verona
Jablonec

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 2D, 7L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.5

5 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Bowie (3 goals)
S. Nebyla (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 67.7

53.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.62

Actual: 0.5 | Diff: -0.12

1.17

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
36.4

Attack: 18.3, Defense: 65.8, Form: 11.0

40.7

Attack: 41.4, Defense: 48.3, Form: 31.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

3
Verona
Jablonec
Verona

Power Rating Breakdown

36.4

Overall

Attack 18.3
Defense 65.8
Form 11.0
Consistency 74.5
Jablonec

Power Rating Breakdown

40.7

Overall

Attack 41.4
Defense 48.3
Form 31.1
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

90.0 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

67.7 vs 50.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Verona logo Verona
L
Como (71%)
D
Juventus (85%)
D
Lecce (53%)
L
AC Milan (60%)
L
Torino (74%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)
L
Atalanta (69%)
L
Genoa (62%)
Jablonec logo Jablonec
D
Hradec Kr. (59%)
L
Sparta Prague (59%)
L
Liberec (43%)
L
Sparta Prague (59%)
W
Ostrava (34%)
W
Zlín (46%)
L
Dukla (51%)
L
Olomouc (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Como H
0 - 1 L
71%
Juventus A
1 - 1 D
85%
Lecce H
0 - 0 D
53%
AC Milan H
0 - 1 L
60%
Torino A
1 - 2 L
74%
Fiorentina H
0 - 1 L
66%
Atalanta A
0 - 1 L
69%
Genoa H
0 - 2 L
62%
Bologna A
2 - 1 W
63%
Napoli H
1 - 2 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hradec Kr. H
1 - 1 D
59%
Sparta Prague A
0 - 2 L
59%
Liberec H
1 - 2 L
43%
Sparta Prague A
1 - 3 L
59%
Ostrava H
4 - 1 W
34%
Zlín A
3 - 0 W
46%
Dukla A
0 - 2 L
51%
Olomouc H
1 - 2 L
46%
Ml. Boleslav A
0 - 3 L
66%
Karviná H
1 - 0 W
43%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.7 vs 53.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Jablonec holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Verona's 0.5, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Verona has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Jablonec's 1.6.

Verona has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Jablonec has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Verona

Verona

VS
Jablonec

Jablonec

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more