Skip to content
Compare Gorica vs Dender

Gorica vs Dender Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gorica vs Dender: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gorica Gorica Home Team
Dender Dender Away Team
Gorica
38.9
L L W W L L D W D D

Last 10 Matches

Dender
33.6
L W L L L W L L D D

Categories Won

8

Gorica

3

Draw

4

Dender

Performance Radar

Gorica
Dender

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Bogojević (3 goals)
D. Hrnčár (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.9

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.15

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
38.9

Attack: 30.9, Defense: 56.3, Form: 25.3

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

1
Gorica
Dender
Gorica

Power Rating Breakdown

38.9

Overall

Attack 30.9
Defense 56.3
Form 25.3
Consistency 53.2
Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6
Defense 38.0
Form 19.0
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

46.9 vs 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gorica logo Gorica
L
Slaven (40%)
L
Dinamo Zagreb (71%)
W
Istra (40%)
W
Vukovar (37%)
L
Lokomotiva (44%)
L
Hajduk (58%)
D
Varaždin (54%)
W
Rijeka (44%)
Dender logo Dender
L
ZW (59%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
L
Cercle Brugge (51%)
L
Cercle Brugge (46%)
L
ZW (65%)
W
La Louvière (54%)
L
Gent (58%)
L
R. Union SG (80%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Slaven A
0 - 1 L
40%
Dinamo Zagreb H
1 - 2 L
71%
Istra H
1 - 0 W
40%
Vukovar A
2 - 1 W
37%
Lokomotiva H
0 - 2 L
44%
Hajduk A
0 - 1 L
58%
Varaždin A
1 - 1 D
54%
Rijeka H
4 - 0 W
44%
Osijek A
0 - 0 D
46%
Slaven H
2 - 2 D
35%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
ZW A
1 - 2 L
59%
La Louvière H
2 - 1 W
38%
Cercle Brugge A
1 - 2 L
51%
Cercle Brugge H
1 - 4 L
46%
ZW H
1 - 2 L
65%
La Louvière A
1 - 0 W
54%
Gent H
1 - 3 L
58%
R. Union SG A
0 - 2 L
80%
Charleroi H
2 - 2 D
57%
Cercle Brugge A
0 - 0 D
63%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Dender has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 44.9) compared to Gorica (SoS: 34.4). This means Dender's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Gorica averaging 1.1 and Dender averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Defensively, Gorica is far superior, conceding just 1.0 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Dender leaks 1.8 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Gorica has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gorica

Gorica

VS
Dender

Dender

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more